There were, supposedly, a lot of "great fires" in the past ... yet according to the official version of history, not many people died. In Chicago, 17,450 buildings burnt but only 300 people died. A similar thing happened in New York and London, where "great fires" destroyed 700 and 13,200 buildings, but only killed 2 and 6 people respectively. How is it that around 32,000 buildings were destroyed in these 3 events, but only 308 people died? All in all, there are recorded "great fires" that destroyed buildings in hundreds of cities around the world. But were they really fires, or bombs to destroy the evidence of advanced technology? Why do pictures show trees surviving these fires but brick not surviving them? Something doesn't add up here.

53-min. DVD